Abortion Clinics Should Not Be Closed

6 PAGES
1248 WORDS
Read the full essay 1248 words
Abortion Clinics Should Not Be Closed

J. Stephenson

In 1973, the Supreme Court?s decision made it possible for women to get safe, legal abortions from well-trained medical surgeons, and therefore led to dramatic decreases in pregnancy-related injury and death ("abortion"). Now there is a new proposal to close abortion clinics. This proposal takes away the privacy rights of American women that are guaranteed by our Constitution. By closing abortion clinics the government is not only taking away women?s rights, but is also punishing those whom want to exercise their right of a pro-choice woman.

Abortion clinics allow thousands of women every year to have abortions. Having the abortion should be woman?s personal choice. By closing these clinics, there will be no providers to perform the operation, so the choice has already been made for them. Closing the clinics will increase the barriers of having an abortion. When there are too many obstacles, the right to make their own choice is taken away from them. In 1973 the American Supreme Court ruled that Americans? right to privacy included: "the right of a woman to decide whether to have children, and the right of a woman and her doctor to make that decision without state interference" ("abortion"). The Constitution says we have a right to privacy, so taking away a woman?s chance to make decisions about her own body violates that right.

The American Civil Liberties Union defends the Constitution and peoples? rights.ACLU has protected the rights of abortion for women, and in recent years has argued mayor cases opposing restrictions that deny woman access to reproductive health care ("ACLU"). Policy 263 states: "The ACLU holds that every woman, as a matter of her right to the enjoyment of life, liberty, and privacy, should be free to determine whether and when to bear children."(The American Civil Liberties Union)

The closure of abortion clinics will be done with the purpose to reduce the number of abortions. This raises the question whether this will be an effective method or not. Before 1973 abortions were illegal yet the number of women who sought abortions did not decrease ("abortion"). Before 1973 many thousands of women died or suffered serious medical problems after attempting to perform their own abortions, or going to untrained doctors who performed cheap abortions with uncivilized methods or in unsanitary conditions (The Abortion Law Homepage.). If clinics are closed, women will still continue to attempt, and succeed, in ending unwanted pregnancies just like before 1973. Women will risk their health and possibly even their lives. By keeping these abortions clinics open it ensures a higher probability that the women who do have abortions will be in a safe, sanitary environment, and therefore injuries will be fewer in number.

If clinics are shut, the waiting lists of abortion clinics in other countries will be much longer. Women will have to wait longer to get an abortion, and will be treated later in their pregnancy which is much more dangerous for the pregnant women.

Pro-life activists claim that the unborn baby is alive and has feelings when the heart begins beating. But, the heartbeat begins between the eighteenth and twenty-fifth day ("Fetus"). They also say that women who have abortions are "murderers". This problem could be solved by keeping abortion clinics open, because then the woman can be treated before the twenty fifth day when the fetus is not yet a living baby. She will not have to wait because of long waiting lists, but instead will have the abortion as soon as possible with as less psychological pain.

If a woman has to travel to another country to have a legal abortion, she will have to pay more money. She will now not only have to pay for the abortion itself, but also the traveling costs and that does not include the psychological costs as well. Not all people can afford these costs. So by keeping clinics open more women will have the chance to exercise their right and have their desired abortion. If a working woman or student suddenly has to leave the country, this means she will have to think of excuses and lies for an explanation. This is not fair to the woman, she should not have


Related Topics

Sexual revolution Abortion Fertility Human reproduction RTT United States pro-choice movement Abortion in the United States Abortion in New Zealand civil liberties union american civil liberties american civil liberties union reproductive health care legal abortions number of abortions dramatic decreases having an abortion abortion clinics state interference supreme courts personal choice life liberty pro choice american women aclu obstacles privacy rights closure constitution

More Free Essays Like This

1984 Reading Journal
AIDS And You
Civilization and Its Discontents
Divorce
England: The City Of Today
English essay
Future Perfect
Gender Inequality & Theories Of Patriarchy
Grapes Of Wrath - Jim Casy Chracter Analysis
Greco-Roman Culture: Lysistrata
History of Postconviction Exonerations
Internet
Jane Eyre: Sexism
Les Liaisons Dangereuses
Literature
Living The Legacy: The Womens Rights Movement 1848-1998
Making Sense Of The Sixties
Mantas Svabauskas
Native American Women
Peyton Place
Porphyrias Lover And My Last Duchess
Rap And Censorship
Rave Culture: The Number One Example Of Social Deviance
1-5 chapter review AA History
The Beatles Impact on America
The Clinton Sex Scandal
The Cultural Narcissist
The Fall Of The Armenians
The Good Enough Family
The Internet: Its Effects And Its Future
The Narcissist?s Mother
The Satirical Essence Of Monty Python Imbibed Into Cotemporary Theatre
Womens Rights Movement
Womens Rights In 3rd World Counrties
Capitalism: Ayn Rand/ Maltese Falcon
Rizal
The Internet Effect: How Has It Affected You?